1. Prior to performing each reaction, a thorough hazard analysis and risk assessment should be carried out regarding each chemical substance and experimental operation on the scale planned and in the context of the laboratory where the procedures will be carried out. Guidelines for carrying out risk assessments and for analyzing the hazards associated with chemicals can be found in references such as Chapter 4 of "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory" (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011; the full text can be accessed free of charge at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12654/prudent-practices-in-the-laboratory-handling-and-management-of-chemical. See also "Identifying and Evaluating Hazards in Research Laboratories" (American Chemical Society, 2015) which is available via the associated website "Hazard Assessment in Research Laboratories" at https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/about/governance/committees/chemicalsafety/hazard-assessment.html. In the case of this procedure, the risk assessment should include (but not necessarily be limited to) an evaluation of the potential hazards associated with phenylpyruvic acid, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, iodomethane, molecular sieves 5Å, hexanal, 2,4-dimethoxybenzylamine, trifluoroacetic acid, sodium sulfate, dichloromethane, hexanes, ethyl acetate, acetone, diethyl ether, 1M hydrochloric acid solution, and silica gel.
2. Phenylpyruvic acid, >90.0% was purchased from TCI and used as received.
3. Dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased from Fisher (HPLC grade >99.5%), dried by mBraun SPS, and stored under argon.
4. 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (99%) was purchased from Thermo Scientific and used as received.
5. Iodomethane (99%) was purchased from Thermo Scientific and used as received.
6. Hexane (technically pure) was purchased from Thommen-Furler. Ethyl acetate (technically pure) was purchased from Thommen-Furler.
7. The phenylpyruvic acid does not move from the baseline under these TLC conditions. The product possesses an Rf = 0.71 (highly UV active spot and ceric ammonium molybdate (CAM) active spot).
8. HCl solution was prepared from a solution (37%) purchased from Merck.
9. Diethyl ether (>99.8%) was purchased from Honeywell and used as received.
10. Sodium sulfate anhydrous (>99.0%) was purchased from Merck.
11. Silica gel 60 M (0.04-0.063 mm) was purchased from Macherey Nagel. Please note that bumping can easily occur during preparation of the compound-infused silica. Considerable product degradation was detected during the preparation of the compound-infused silica. Approximately 100 mL of hexanes was used to complete the loading of the compound-infused silica onto the column. The chromatography column, prior to the addition of the compound-infused silica, was 10 cm in length. The column diameter was approximately 5.5 cm.
12. The flash column is eluted with a step gradient of 100 mL hexanes, 200 mL 2.5% EtOAc:hexanes, 200 mL 5.0% EtOAc:hexanes, 200 mL 7.5% EtOAc:hexanes and 600 mL of 10% EtOAc:hexanes (Note 12). Methyl (Z)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylacrylate (1) began appearing in TLC fractions when 10% EtOAc:hexanes was the mobile phase, so this mixture was maintained until all compound eluted from the flash column. Fractions of 25 mL fractions were collected in 18 x 150 mm glass test tubes. The product appeared in fractions 32-65 as observed by TLC analysis on silica gel with 2:3 EtOAc-hexane as eluent and visualizing with both UV and CAM staining.
13. Methyl (Z)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylacrylate (1): mp 56-62 ℃ (provided by submitter). Compound (1) exists 85% as the enol tautomer and 15% as the keto tautomer. Enol tautomer: 1H NMR pdf (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.80 (dt, J = 8.2, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (td, J = 7.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 3.95 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3H); Keto tautomer: 1H NMR pdf (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.39-7.36 (m, 2H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.16 (s, 2H), 3.87 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H); Enol tautomer: 13C NMR pdf (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 166.9, 139.2, 134.2, 130.0 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.1, 111.3, 53.4; Keto tautomer: 13C NMR pdf (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 191.1, 161.5, 131.7, 130.5, 129.9 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 127.6, 53.2, 45.8. IR (film) νmax: 3381, 3053, 2057, 1256, 1573, 1494, 1450, 1440, 1390, 1344, 1330, 1243, 1199, 1184, 1114, 1032,980, 918, 882, 867, 840, 775, 748, 689, 635, 595, 554, 481, 459, 417, 404 cm-1. HRMS-ESI-[M+H]+ calculated for [C10H11O3]+: 179.0703, found: 179.0702.The purity of (1) was determined to be 98 wt% by qNMR pdf using ethylene carbonate (Sigma Aldrich, standard for quantitative NMR, TraceCERT) as the internal standard.
14. When the reaction was performed on a larger scale, a yield of 2.48 g (92%) was isolated with 88% purity.
15. Molecular sieves 5 Å, 8 to 12 mesh were purchased from Thermo Scientific. Sieves were grinded, and the powder was activated at 200 ℃ for 14 - 16 h. The powder was used after fresh activation.
16. Anhydrous dichloromethane was purchased from Honeywell (HPLC grade >99.5%), dried by mBraun SPS, and stored under argon.
17. Hexanal (98%) was purchased from Thermo Scientific and used as received.
18. 2,4-Dimethoxybenzylamine (98%) was purchased from Thermo Scientific and used as received.
19. 1-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-3-hydroxy-5-pentyl-4-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (2): mp 145-146 ℃. 1H NMR pdf (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.57 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18c (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.48-6.43 (m, 2H), 5.01 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.80 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H), 1.95 (ddt, J = 15.5, 11.7, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 1.79-1.69 (m, 1H), 1.13 (h, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.09-1.00 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.81 (m, 2H), 0.75 (t, J = 7.25 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR pdf (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 167.5, 160.7, 158.5, 142.1. 132.0, 131.0, 128.6 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 127.4, 121.2, 117.6, 104.5, 98.6, 56.9, 55.5, 38.4, 31.7, 28.6, 22.6, 20.8, 14.1. IR (film) νmax: 3171, 2918, 1651, 1610, 1508, 1444, 1383, 1336, 1308, 1261, 1235, 1208, 1166, 1126, 1109, 1031, 938, 855, 820, 792, 766, 729, 692, 652, 636, 555, 497, 464, 438, 423 cm-1. HRMS-ESI-[M+H]+ calculated for [C24H30NO4]+: 396.2169, found: 396.2168. The purity of (2) was determined to be >99 wt% by qNMR pdf using ethylene carbonate (Sigma Aldrich) as the external standard.
20. A second reaction at full scale provided 2.59 g (78%) of the product with >97% purity.
21. Trifluoroacetic acid (98.5%) was purchased from Honeywell and used as received.
22. UV visualization of the TLC plate proved to be inadequate for comparison of starting material consumption and product formation (Figure 14a). Initial TLC analysis performed immediately after addition of trifluoroacetic acid showed significant starting material present on TLC (Figure 14b). The starting material appears purple with CAM staining and heating. As the reaction progresses and the Dmb group is cleaved, the appearance of the 'charred' product spot differs significantly from the 'charred' starting material spot, which can be used to assess completion of the reaction (Figure 14c).
23. In rare cases, the submitters observed that immediate precipitation did not occur after removal of the purple solid impurity from the first filtration as shown in Figure 11, which is suspected to be due to residual trifluoroacetic acid. In such cases, precipitation can be induced by concentrating the filtrate using a rotary evaporator providing a white solid with some pink/purple discoloration. The impure product can be purified by adding 200 mL of dichloromethane:hexanes (1:9; v/v), briefly sonicating, adding another 50 mL hexanes, and briefly sonicating once again. Concentration to a volume of approximately 100 mL provides the product as a white solid with less pink/purple discoloration. A sample of this filtered solid was taken for 1H NMR analysis confirming relatively high purity of product, which is also provided in this protocol. Finally, the collected product can be redissolved in a mixture of 200 mL hexanes and 50 mL dichloromethane. Upon sonication, the product forms as a white precipitate that can be isolated by vacuum filtration providing 3-hydroxy-5-pentyl-4-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (3) in similar yield.
24. Acetone (>99.5%) was purchased from Merck and used as received.
25. 3-Hydroxy-5-pentyl-4-phenyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (3): mp 168-169 ℃. 1H NMR pdf (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.85 (s, 1H), 8.58 (s, 1H), 7.59 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.4, Hz, 1H), 4.48 (dd, J = 7.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.79-1.66 (m, 1H), 1.33-1.07 (m, 7H), 0.79 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR pdf (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 168.2, 143.5, 132.5, 128.4 (2C), 126.9 (2C), 126.8, 122.0, 52.8, 33.1, 31.1, 23.4, 22.0, 13.8. IR (film) νmax 3260, 2997, 2955, 2856, 1698, 1671, 1497, 1429, 1406, 1360, 1296, 1226, 1103, 1063, 1028, 895, 870, 767, 696, 640, 477, 439, 425 cm-1. HRMS-ESI-[M+H]+ calculated for [C15H20NO]+: 246.1489, found: 246.1490. The purity of (3) was determined to be >99 wt% by qNMR pdf using ethylene carbonate (Sigma Aldrich) as the external standard.
26. A second reaction performed at half-scale provided 0.73 g (47%) of the product with 96% purity.