Checked by Richard S. Gordon and Andrew B. Holmes.
1. Procedure
2. Notes
1.
The checkers dried all glassware at 120°C for at least 2 hr, and cooled under
argon where appropriate. The submitters dried all glassware at 140°C for at least 4 hr and cooled to 25°C under a flow of
argon. Solvents were distilled from the indicated drying agent and were used immediately:
dichloromethane (
CaH2),
diethyl ether and
tetrahydrofuran (
sodium/benzophenone),
chloroform (
potassium carbonate), and
triethylamine (
KOH).
2.
Dibenzofuran (99%), sec-butyllithium (1.3 M in cyclohexane), N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine (99%), N,N-dimethylformamide (anhydrous, 99.8%), (R)-(−)-2-phenylglycinol (98%) and (diethylamino)sulfur trifluoride (DAST) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. Thionyl chloride (99.5%) was purchased from Acros Organics and
carbon dioxide (commercial grade) was purchased from Matheson Gas Products Inc. Except for
dibenzofuran, all reagents were used as received.
3.
Commercial
dibenzofuran was not purified. The checkers used recrystallized and commercial
dibenzofuran as received in separate experiments with no significant difference in yield.
4.
The submitters used a large stirbar followed by a
mechanical stirrer (upon introduction of CO
2) to ensure efficient stirring throughout. After initial experiments, the checkers carried out the whole procedure using a
powerful magnetic stirrer (and a large magnetic stirbar) with no adverse effect on yield. The checkers observed no improvement in yield when a half-scale reaction was carried out using a mechanical stirrer.
5.
To transfer
137 mL of sec-butyllithium, the contents of an entire 100-mL Sure/Seal
™ bottle were transferred via cannula, while the remaining 37 mL were transferred via syringe from another bottle.
6.
Carbon dioxide was dried by passing the gas through a
gas-washing bottle (equipped with a fritted cylindrical gas-dispersion tube) containing concentrated
sulfuric acid. For safety reasons, empty gas-washing bottles were placed before and after the H
2SO
4-containing bottle. The gas was introduced into the flask through a
wide pipette (0.8 cm i. d.) which was submerged below the level of the reaction mixture. The checkers observed very little difference in yield irrespective of whether the inlet tube was above or below the surface of the reaction mixture.
7.
The beige-colored suspension turned white upon introduction of
carbon dioxide. The submitters adjusted the rate of addition such that the internal temperature remained below −65°C. At −25°C, the white suspension turned red-brown. The checkers did not monitor the internal temperature of the reaction, but ensured that the CO
2 addition was slow and constant.
8.
The yellow supernatant/filtrate comprises TMEDA in Et
2O, while the remaining solid is the lithiocarboxylate of diacid
2. No precaution was taken during filtration to exclude air or moisture.
9.
The submitters obtained
15.1 g (
99%). Data for
2:
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ 7.53 (dd, 2 H, J = 7.5 and 7.5), 8.04 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5), 8.44 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5), 13.30 (bs, 2 H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ 116.9, 123.7, 124.9, 126.2, 130.4, 154.6, 165.7; IR (solid phase) cm
−1: 2858, 1686, 1431, 1305, 1288, 1154; MS (EI) m/z 256 (M
+, 15), 181 (15), 69 (100); HRMS (ES, M + Na
+) m/z Calcd for C
14H
8O
5Na 279.0264. Found 279.0269, Anal. Calcd for C
14H
8O
5: C, 65.6; H, 3.1. Found: C, 65.1; H, 3.2. The submitters reported
mp 324-325°C. The checkers could not obtain a mp for this material, but observed decomposition at temperatures
> 320°C (lit.
4 > 300°C).
10.
The checkers carried out the reaction with undistilled
chloroform, with no difference in yields.
11.
Although the solution is yellow, the reaction mixture remained cloudy throughout.
12.
It is important not to use too much
chloroform because the product is sparingly soluble.
13.
The submitters obtained
5.0 g (
87%). Data for
3:
mp 242-244°C,
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3) δ 7.59 (dd, 2 H, J = 5 and 5), 8.31 (dd, 2 H, J = 5 and 1), 8.33 (dd, 2 H, J = 5 and 1);
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ 119.3, 123.9, 124.8, 127.7, 132.6, 163.4, 168.2; IR (solid phase) cm
−1: 1757, 1622, 1587, 1474, 1425, 1236, 1184, 1142; MS (EI) m/z 292 (M
+, 40), 257 (40), 169 (20), 119 (20); HRMS (EI, M
+) m/z Calcd for C
14H
6Cl
2O
3 291.9694. Found: 291.9699; Anal. Calcd for C
14H
6Cl
2O
3: C, 57.5; H, 2.1. Found: C, 56.7; H, 2.1.
14.
The checkers had to carefully warm the contents in the addition funnel (using a heat gun) to completely dissolve the
(R)-(−)-2-phenylglycinol. The contents of the funnel were allowed to cool before addition to the reaction mixture.
15.
The submitters observed that slow addition is necessary to avoid formation of a thick gel-like slurry and noted that adding additional CHCl
3 is beneficial if the slurry
3 is too viscous to stir. The submitters observed (over the course of 15 hr) the formation of a thick slurry which in turn became a free flowing white suspension. The checkers observed the immediate formation of a clear yellow solution, which became cloudy, and sometimes a thick slurry, during the course of the reaction.
16.
The product is partially soluble in CHCl
3 and additional CHCl
3 is added to recover as much product as possible. However, significant product still remains undissolved.
17.
The submitters omitted the extraction of the first residue (which consists of
triethylamine hydrochloride, excess
ammonium chloride (NH
4Cl) and amide
4) with THF, but the checkers found this essential in order to obtain the higher yield (
88%) reported. To recover all amide
4, it is necessary to repeat the procedure, because the product requires extended periods to dissolve completely. As an alternative work up procedure, the checkers removed the CHCl
3 under reduced pressure and stirred the reaction mixture in
THF (250 mL containing ca. 5 g of NH4Cl) for 1 hr. After filtration of the suspension, recovery of
4 was poor (
3.6 g from two recrystallizations).
18.
The submitters obtained
7.4 g (
87%) of
4. Data for
4:
mp 185-186°C;
1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ 3.66-3.81 (m, 4 H, CH
2OH), 4.98 (t, 2 H, J = 5, CH
2OH), 5.20 (dd, 2 H, J = 7 and 14, CHPh), 7.16-7.27 (m, 6 H), 7.42-7.60 (m, 6 H), 8.00 (dd, 2 H, J = 1 and 8), 8.36 (dd, 2 H, J = 1 and 8), 8.81 (d, 2 H, J = 8, PhCHNH);
13C NMR (63 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ 56.5, 65.3, 120.1, 123.9, 124.4, 124.7, 127.4, 127.6, 128.2, 128.7, 141.3, 153.1, 163.8; IR (solid phase) cm
−1: 3365, 3278, 1636, 1571, 1530, 1339, 1290, 1190, 1029; MS (ES) m/z 517 (M+Na
+, 40), 495 (M+H, 100), 375 (50), 255 (25); HRMS (ES, M + Na
+) m/z Calcd for C
30H
26N
2O
5Na: 517.1739. Found: 517.1732; Anal. Calcd for C
30H
26N
2O
5: C, 72.9; H, 5.3; N, 6.0. Found: C, 72.5; H, 5.4; N, 5.7.
19.
The checkers used an electrical refrigeration bath to maintain this reaction temperature.
20.
The silica gel is stirred for 30 min in 20% EtOAc/hexanes containing 5% (v/v) Et
3N prior to packing the column. Before applying the crude material, the column was equilibrated with 20% EtOAc/hexanes to remove excess Et
3N.
21.
Data for recrystallized
5: R
f (
5) = 0.19 (40% EtOAc/hexanes),
mp 126-127°C (submitters observed
mp 125.0-126°C, lit.
4 134.0-135°C),
[α]D23 +46.92 (c 0.97, CHCl3) [submitters observed
[α]D23+50.75 (c 1.07, CHCl3)]; [lit.
4 +47.75 (c 1.07 CHCl3)],
1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl
3) δ 4.38 (br t, 2 H, J = 8), 4.96 (dd, 2 H, J = 10 and 10), 5.54 (dd, 2 H, J = 9.5 and 9.5), 7.23-7.45 (m, 12 H), 8.10-8.19 (m, 4 H);
13C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl
3) δ 69.9, 74.9, 113.1, 123.2, 124.0, 124.9, 126.9, 127.6, 128.8, 142.4, 154.4, 162.4; IR (solid phase) cm
−1: 1642, 1424, 1412, 1283, 1184, 1120, 1072; MS (ES) m/z 459 (M+H, 95), 253 (10); HRMS (ES, M + H) m/z Calcd for C
30H
22N
2O
3Na: 459.1708. Found: 459.1721. Anal. Calcd for C
30H
22N
2O
3: C, 78.6; H, 4.8; N, 6.1. Found: C, 78.5; H, 4.8; N, 6.1.
22.
The checkers also prepared (S,S)-
5 over two steps according to the same procedure from the reaction of
3 with
(S)-(−)-2-phenylglycinol purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc. In addition to the spectroscopic properties of (S,S)-
5 which were identical to those reported above for the (R,R)-enantiomer, the checkers observed
mp 126.0-127°C,
[α]D23 −43.20 (c 1.00, CHCl3).
23.
The enantiomeric purities of (R,R)-
5 and (S,S)-
5 were measured separately by courtesy of Mr. Eric Hortense (GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage). Chiral HPLC analysis [25 cm Chiracel OD-H, column no. ODHOCE-IF029, mobile phase
ethanol/
heptane 1:4 (v/v), UV detector at 215 nm, flow rate 1.0 mL/min at 25°C] of (R,R)-
5 yielded a retention time of 7.4 min, while that of enantiomer (S,S)-
5 showed a retention time of 8.7 min. The enantiomeric ratio of (R,R)-
5 was in excess of 99.5:0.5, while that of (S,S)-
5 was also >99.5:0.5. The submitters determined the enantiomeric purity of (R,R)-5 as 99% ee by chiral HPLC on a Chiracel OD column (7%
2-propanol/hexanes, 1 mL/min, t(R) = 45 min, t(S) = 65 min).
4
The procedures in this article are intended for use only by persons with prior training in experimental organic chemistry. All hazardous materials should be handled using the standard procedures for work with chemicals described in references such as "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory" (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011 www.nap.edu). All chemical waste should be disposed of in accordance with local regulations. For general guidelines for the management of chemical waste, see Chapter 8 of Prudent Practices.
These procedures must be conducted at one's own risk. Organic Syntheses, Inc., its Editors, and its Board of Directors do not warrant or guarantee the safety of individuals using these procedures and hereby disclaim any liability for any injuries or damages claimed to have resulted from or related in any way to the procedures herein.
3. Discussion
(1) The overall yield of the four-step ligand preparation is increased from 28% to 71%. The improved dicarboxylation of 4,6-dilithiodibenzofuran significantly contributes to this yield increase. Originally, the dilithiated dibenzofuran was quenched with dry ice (solid CO2), which presumably led to competitive protonation and ketone formation. In this procedure, dry CO2 is introduced as a gas and gives a quantitative yield of dicarboxylated material 2.
(2) The original protocol was not amenable for scale-up. The current procedure performs reliably on a 2-5 gram scale.
(3) All intermediates are purified by recrystallization. This provides for clean bis(2-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl) amide 4, which is essential for the excellent yields obtained in the final cyclodehydration.
(4) The DAST-mediated cyclodehydration gives higher yields of DBFOX than the original base-mediated cyclization.
Appendix
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature (Collective Index Number);
(Registry Number)
(R,R)-4,6-Dibenzofurandiyl-2,2'-bis(4-phenyloxazoline) (DBFOX/PH):
Oxazole, 2,2'-(4,6-dibenzofurandiyl)bis(4,5-dihydro-4-phenyl-, (4R,4'R- (9); (195433-00-2)
Dibenzofuran: (8,9); (132-64-9)
sec-Butyllithium:
Lithium, (1-methylpropyl)- (9); (598-30-1)
N,N,N',N'-Tetramethylethylenediamine, 1,2-Ethanediamine, N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl- (9); (110-18-9)
Carbon dioxide: (8,9); (124-38-9)
Dibenzofuran-4,6-dicarboxylic acid:
4,6-Dibenzofurandicarboxylic acid (9); (88818-47-7)
Thionyl chloride (8,9); (7719-09-7)
N,N-Dimethylformamide:
Formamide, N,N-diethyl- (8,9); (68-12-2)
Dibenzofuran-4,6-dicarbonyl chloride:
4,6-Dibenzofurandicarbonyl dichloride (9); (151412-73-8)
(R)-(−)-2-Phenylglycinol:
Benzeneethanol, β-amino-, (βR)- (9); (56613-80-0)
Triethylamine:
Ethanamine, N,N-diethyl- (9); (121-44-8)
Diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST):
Sulfur, (N-ethylethanaminato)trifluoro-, (T-4) (9); (38078-09-0)
(R,R)-Dibenzofuran-4,6-dicarboxylic acid bis(2-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl) amide:
4,6-Dibenzofurandicarboxamide, N,N'-bis[(1R)-2-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl]- (9); (247097-79-6)
Copyright © 1921-, Organic Syntheses, Inc. All Rights Reserved