Checked by Scott E. Denmark and Jack Hung-Chang Liu.
1. Procedure
2. Notes
1.
2-Iodoaniline (>98%) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. or from Lancaster.
2-Iodoaniline was recrystallized by dissolving the commercial material in
benzene with stirring in a round-bottomed flask, in a 50 °C
oil bath. For each gram of
2-iodoaniline,
1 mL of benzene was used. To the dark brown solution of
2-iodoaniline was then slowly added
petroleum ether with stirring. Approximately four times the volume of
benzene was added. This mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and was then cooled in −20 °C for approximately 4 hours. The dark brown crystals were filtered off through a coarse fritted funnel, and were further purified by sublimation under high vacuum for approximately 2 to 2.5 h (oil bath temperature: 50–55 °C, cold finger of the sublimator cooled by a dry
ice-acetone bath). The melting point of the purified material was 56–57 °C and was significantly less colored.
Copper(I) iodide (CuI, 99.999%),
(PPh3)2PdCl2 (99.99%) (Aldrich Chemical Co.), glacial
acetic acid (99%, Fluka),
2,5-dimethoxytetrahydrofuran (99%, cis/trans mixture, Acros Organics), and
piperidine (99%, Aldrich Chemical Co.) were purchased from the suppliers indicated.
2,5-Dimethoxytetrahydrofuran was purified by short path distillation. Other chemicals were used as received.
Toluene and
pentane were dried by distillation over
Na/benzophenone prior to use.
2.
For Step A, the checkers were not able to reproduce the yield when the reaction was carried out on 114.0 mmol scale; considerably more unreacted
2-iodoaniline remained than when the reaction was carried out on 57.0 mmol scale. This was most likely due to the less efficient heat transfer into a
100-mL flask. Consequently, the distillate was a mixture of starting material and product.
3.
The short path distillation was performed with a one-piece distillation apparatus consisting of a vacuum-jacketed distillation head and short (approximately 3 cm) condenser arm. This equipment enables adiabatic distillation and is commercially available from Ace Glass (catalog no. 9317-42).
4.
1H NMR
pdf (500 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 6.35 (t,
J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.82 (t,
J = 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.11 (ddd,
J = 9.0, 7.9, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.31 (dd,
J = 7.8, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.42 (ddd,
J = 8.8, 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.95 (dd,
J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1 H);
13C NMR
pdf (126 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 96.0, 109.3, 122.3, 128.2, 129.1, 129.6, 140.1, 144.2; MS (EI)
m/
z (relative intensity): 269 (100%, [M
+]), 142 (35%), 115 (62%); HRMS (EI)
m/z, calcd for C
10H
8NI: 268.9702; found: 268.9701; IR (film): 3101, 1582, 1494, 1438, 1072, 1012, 924, 760, 724 cm
−1. Anal. calcd for C
10H
8IN (269.08): C, 44.64; H, 3.00; N, 5.21. Found: C, 44.65; H, 2.77; N, 5.02.
5.
The product is stable for extended periods of time when kept in a refrigerator.
6.
The gas dispersion tube was purchased from ACE Glass (catalog no. 9435-78).
7.
Propyne purchased from Matheson Inc. was used without further purification.
8.
A flow-meter (Matheson Tri-Gas: PM-1000, part no. MN11E101 N201) showed that a total of approximately
9 L of propyne was passed through the solution. If a less vigorous stream of
propyne is chosen, then the reaction time will increase accordingly. In all cases, however, the formation of a black precipitate indicated complete conversion.
9.
1H NMR
pdf (500 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 2.03 (s, 3 H), 6.36 (dt,
J = 2.5, 1.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dt,
J = 2.2, 1.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (dt,
J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.31 (dd,
J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.36 (dt,
J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H);
13C NMR
pdf (126 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 4.7, 76.8, 91.0, 109.2, 118.8, 121.8, 125.0, 126.3, 128.7, 134.2, 142.0; MS (EI)
m/
z (relative intensity): 181 (100%, [M
+]), 180 (95%), 166 (3%), 154 (18%), 152 (11%), 140 (2%), 127 (4%), 115 (3%), 89 (5%), 77 (7%); HRMS (EI)
m/z, calcd for C
13H
11N: 181.0891, found: 181.0886; IR (film): 3102, 2914, 2849, 2226, 1599, 1501, 1478, 1332, 1102, 1070, 761, 725 cm
−1. Anal. calcd for C
13H
11N (181.24): C, 86.15; H, 6.12; N, 7.73; Found: C, 86.02; H, 6.12; N, 8.04.
10.
InCl3 (99.999%, Strem Chemicals) was used as received. Due to its hygroscopic character, this compound was kept in a dry box.
11.
Occasionally, the reaction time was found to be somewhat longer. The progress of the reaction and the purity of the product can be monitored by GC (Hewlett-Packard HP-5,
5% phenylmethylsiloxane column: 50 m, 0.25 mm), temperature program: 70 °C → 270 °C, 20 °C/min, then 270 °C for 6.0 min; retention time: 11.81 min (starting material), 14.24 min (product).
12.
In a second run, the checkers found that a higher yield (
4.20 g,
93%) could be obtained by exhaustive Soxhlet extraction for 48 h. Sublimation of this material (oil bath: 50–60 °C, 7 h), afforded
3.97 g (
88%) of the product as a white solid.
13.
The sublimation was performed by immersing a large side-armed test tube (42 mm × 175 mm) containing the crude product in an oil bath and subliming the product under reduced pressure onto the cold wall of a smaller test tube (25 mm × 150 mm) cooled with a dry-ice/
acetone slush. The smaller test tube, which served as a cold finger, was secured by a large
rubber stopper. During the sublimation, the bath temperature should not exceed 60 °C to avoid undue decomposition. The purity of the material can be checked by GC
(Note 11).
14.
The submitters found that analytically pure material (
2.49 g,
55%) could also be obtained by recrystallization from
hexanes (15 mL).
15.
In solid form, the product can be stored in a refrigerator for extended periods of time. However, the product is sensitive in solution to traces of acid present in CDCl
3 that has not been rigorously purified.
16.
1H NMR
pdf (500 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 2.45 (d,
J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H), 6.54 (dd,
J = 3.8, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.81 (dd,
J = 3.8, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 7.30 (dt,
J = 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.46 (dt,
J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.60 (dd,
J = 7.8, 1.4, 1 H), 7.87 (d,
J = 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.87 (d,
J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H);
13C NMR
pdf (126 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 18.5, 101.3, 112.5, 112.6, 114.2, 117.7, 123.7, 124.6, 127.0, 128.0, 128.1, 129.4, 132.7; MS (EI)
m/
z (relative intensity): 181 (100%, [M+]), 180 (42%), 152 (8%), 91 (7%), 77 (7%); HRMS (EI)
m/z, calcd for C
13H
11N: 181.0891; found: 181.0890; IR (film): 3142, 1608, 1541, 1486, 1458, 1419, 1366, 1192, 1088, 867, 840, 774, 753, 739, 703 cm
−1. Anal. calcd for C
13H
11N (181.24): C, 86.15; H, 6.12; N, 7.73. Found: C, 86.03; H, 6.15; N, 7.85.
The procedures in this article are intended for use only by persons with prior training in experimental organic chemistry. All hazardous materials should be handled using the standard procedures for work with chemicals described in references such as "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory" (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011 www.nap.edu). All chemical waste should be disposed of in accordance with local regulations. For general guidelines for the management of chemical waste, see Chapter 8 of Prudent Practices.
These procedures must be conducted at one's own risk. Organic Syntheses, Inc., its Editors, and its Board of Directors do not warrant or guarantee the safety of individuals using these procedures and hereby disclaim any liability for any injuries or damages claimed to have resulted from or related in any way to the procedures herein.
3. Discussion
The ability of "soft" metal salts such as
PtCl2,
AuCl3 or
InCl3 to render alkynes susceptible to attack by (tethered) nucleophiles such as alkenes, allyl ethers, or aromatic systems has been recognized only recently.
2-4 The ensuing skeletal rearrangements are inherently attractive for increasing molecular complexity. In this context, it has been shown that readily available biaryl derivatives containing an alkyne unit at one of their
ortho-positions are converted into substituted phenanthrenes, or heterocyclic congeners thereof, on exposure to catalytic amounts of these salts in an inert solvent.
5-7 The most widely applied catalyst for this purpose is
PtCl2, although
GaCl3 and
InCl3 tend to give higher yields with heteroaromatic substrates as well as with biaryl derivatives bearing halo-alkynes. Such metal-catalyzed transformations accommodate substantial structural variations as can be seen from the selected examples compiled in the Table. In addition to a host of phenanthrene derivatives, substituted helicenes, benzoindoles, benzocarbazoles, napthothiophenes, or pyrrolo[1,2-
a]quino-lines can be obtained in good to excellent yields.
5-7 Since the latter class of heterocycles is endowed with promising biological activities but is difficult to make by more conventional methodology,
8 the procedure detailed above provides a good illustration for the advantages associated with this novel catalytic approach.
Copyright © 1921-, Organic Syntheses, Inc. All Rights Reserved