^
Top
Org. Synth. 2012, 89, 420-431
DOI: 10.15227/orgsyn.089.0420
Preparation of (Ra)-Methyl 3-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)hexa-3,4-dienoate
Submitted by Ryan A. Brawn and James S. Panek1.
Checked by Francois Grillet and Kay M. Brummond.
1. Procedure
(±)-4-(Dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol d(2). An oven-dried, one-necked, 500-mL, round-bottomed flask equipped with a 3-inch, egg-shaped, Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar and rubber septum is charged with flame-dried lithium chloride (6.36 g, 150 mmol, 2 equiv) (Notes (Note 1) and (Note 2)). Tetrahydrofuran (150 mL) and 3-butyn-2-ol (1) (6.06 mL, 5.42 g, 75 mmol, 1 equiv) are added by syringe, and the flask is chilled to -78 °C in a dry ice/acetone bath. The rubber septum is replaced with a pressure-equalizing addition funnel and n-butyllithium (60 mL of a 2.5 M solution in hexanes, 150 mmol, 2 equiv) is transferred to the addition funnel using cannula techniques and then added dropwise to the cooled solution over 15 min. The solution is stirred for an additional 30 min at -78 °C (Note 3). The addition funnel is replaced with a rubber septum and chloro(dimethyl)phenylsilane (12.59 mL, 12.80 g, 75 mmol, 1 equiv) (Note 4) is added dropwise over 15 min via syringe, and the cloudy white mixture is stirred 14 h while warming slowly to room temperature. After cooling to 0 °C, the septum is removed and the cloudy yellow mixture is quenched by careful addition of 0.1 M HCl (100 mL, 10 mL portions added over 5 min) and stirred at room temperature for an additional 20 min. The reaction mixture is poured into a 1-L separatory funnel and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 50 mL), and the combined organic layers are washed with water (25 mL) and brine (25 mL). The organic layer is dried with MgSO4 (15 g), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography (Note 5) (10% ethyl acetate/hexanes) yields (±)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol (2) (13.73 g, 67.2 mmol, 90% yield) as a pale yellow oil (Note 6).
(S)-4-(Dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol (S)-2. A single-necked, 250-mL, round-bottomed flask equipped with a rubber septum and a 3-inch, egg-shaped, Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar is charged with racemic 4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol (15.03 g, 73.5 mmol, 1 equiv) and n-pentane (100 mL). Lipase AK Amano (4.5 g, 0.3 weight equiv) (Note 7) is added in one portion, followed by the addition of vinyl acetate by syringe (33.9 mL, 31.66 g, 367.7 mmol, 5 equiv). The resulting brown dispersion is stirred at room temperature and the reaction is monitored by 1H NMR (Note 8). Upon completion the reaction mixture is filtered through a fritted funnel to remove the lipase, the precipitate is washed with diethyl ether (2 × 100 mL), and the clear filtrate is concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (Note 9) (gradient elution 5%-20% ethyl acetate/hexanes) results in (S)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol (S)-2 (7.04 g, 34.4 mmol, 47% yield) as a clear yellow oil (Note 10). Also isolated is the (R)-acetate (R)-3 (7.69 g, 31.2 mmol, 43% yield) (see discussion).
(Ra)-Methyl 3-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)hexa-3,4-dienoate (Ra-4). A single-necked, 250-mL, round-bottomed flask equipped with a rubber septum and a 3-inch, egg-shaped, Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar is charged with (S)-4-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol (S-2) (6.61 g, 32.3 mmol, 1 equiv) , trimethylorthoacetate (16.5 mL, 15.55 g, 129.3 mmol, 4 equiv) and xylenes (66 mL) (Note 11). Propionic acid (0.12 mL, 0.12 g, 1.62 mmol, 0.05 equiv) is added, and a reflux condenser is attached. The flask is placed in a pre-heated 160 °C oil bath and the solution is heated at reflux for 24 h (Note 12). Additional trimethylorthoacetate is added (8.2 mL, 7.77 g, 64.7 mmol, 2 equiv) by syringe, and the solution is refluxed for an additional 16 h. The pale yellow solution is cooled to room temperature, concentrated (Note 13) and purified by column chromatography (Note 14) (2% ethyl acetate/hexanes) to give (R)-methyl 3-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)hexa-3,4-dienoate (Ra)-4 (6.53 g, 25.1 mmol, 78% yield) as a light yellow oil (Note 15). The product is formed in >93% ee (Note 16).
2. Notes
1. Lithium chloride was flame dried under vacuum for 10 min. All glassware is dried overnight at 95 °C prior to use. All reactions are run under 1 atmosphere of argon. All solvents and reagents are added via syringe through a rubber septum. All reagents are purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received unless another vendor or method of purification is specified below. The purity of 3-butyn-2-ol used was 97%. Anhydrous 99.9%, inhibitor free tetrahydrofuran was purchased from Aldrich and purified with alumina using the Sol-Tek ST-002 solvent purification system directly before use. The submitters report that reagent grade tetrahydrofuran was freshly distilled from sodium/benzophenone ketyl under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen.
2. The submitters report that the three-step reaction sequence can be performed on a 150-mmol scale with similar yields and stereocontrol.
3. Significant quantities of salts are formed during this reaction, so efficient stirring is crucial.
4. Phenyldimethylchlorosilane is purchased from Gelest and used as received.
5. The column was packed with 275 g of silica gel, then 500 mL of hexanes followed by 500 mL of 5% ethyl acetate/hexanes are used to elute unreacted silane (Rf = 0.95, 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes), followed by 4 L 10% ethyl acetate/hexanes . Fractions were collected using 50 mL test tubes, the product has an Rf = 0.40 in 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes, and stains strongly with potassium permanganate. Alcohol (2) exhibits the following characteristics: 1H NMR pdf(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.42 (s, 6 H), 1.49 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.96 (m, 1 H), 4.56 (m, 1 H), 7.37 - 7.39 (m, 3 H), 7.60 - 7.63 (m, 2H); 13C NMR pdf(150 MHz, CDCl3) δ: -1.0, 24.1, 58.6, 86.2, 109.4, 127.9, 129.4, 133.6, 136.6; IR (film) υmax 3330, 3076, 2978, 2181, 1429 cm−1; HRMS (CI, NH3) m/z calcd for C12H17OSi [M+H]+ 205.1049, found: 205.1040; Anal. calcd. for C12H16OSi: C, 70.53, H, 7.89. Found: C, 70.30, H, 7.79.
6. When the reaction was performed at half-scale, 6.9 g (90%) of product was isolated.
7. Lipase AK is purchased from Amano Enzyme Inc. The lipase is washed with diethyl ether (50 mL), filtered and air dried for 30 min immediately before use.
8. Small aliquots of the solution are removed and filtered through a cotton plug to remove traces of enzyme. The filtrate is concentrated under vacuum, and a 1H NMR of the residue is taken. The reaction is judged complete when the integral ratios of the resonances for the protons alpha to the alcohol (δ 4.55) and alpha to the acetate (δ 5.52) are equal, typically requiring 15-20 h.
9. The column was packed with 400 g of silica gel. Elution with 2.5 L of 5% ethyl acetate/hexanes affords acetate 3 (Rf = 0.60, 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes). The first 1.0 L of eluent is collected in 250 mL fractions, followed by 50 mL fractions. Next, elution with 4.2 L of 10% ethyl acetate/hexanes is used to collect alcohol ((S)-2), 50 mL fractions are collected throughout, (Rf = 0.40 in 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes and stains strongly with potassium permanganate). Enantioenriched alcohol ((S)-2) exhibits the following characteristics: 1H NMR pdf(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.43 (s, 6 H), 1.47 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.93 (m, 1 H), 4.56 (m, 1 H), 7.26 - 7.40 (m, 3H), 7.62 - 7.63 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR pdf(150 MHz, CDCl3) δ: -1.0, 24.1, 58.6, 86.3, 109.4, 127.9, 129.4, 133.6, 136.6; IR (film) υmax 3342, 3064, 2982, 2177, 1429 cm−1; HRMS (CI, NH3) m/z calcd for C12H17OSi [M+H]+ 205.1049, found: 205.1051; Anal. calcd. for C12H16OSi: C, 70.53, H, 7.89. Found: C, 70.25, H, 7.97; [α]20D-11.2 (c 5.5, CH2Cl2).
10. When the reaction was performed at half-scale, 3.31 g (49%) of product was isolated. The checkers established the enantiomeric purity of ((S)-2) by HPLC analysis (Note 17) run on a Chiralpak IB-3 column eluting in 0.5% 2-propanol/hexanes, with a 2.0 μL injection and a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. The alcohol has >98% ee. The peaks are visualized at 210 nm, with the racemic alcohol 2 exhibiting equal peaks with retention times of 11.6 and 12.6 min, and the enantioenriched alcohol ((S)-2) exhibiting a major peak with a retention time of 12.8 min (minor enantiomer has a retention time of 11.9 min). The submitters established the enantiomeric purity of the alcohol using a dilute solution (~0.2 mg/mL, it can be difficult to see baseline separation otherwise). HPLC is run on a ChiralCel OD column eluting in 1% 2-propanol /hexanes, with a 10 μL injection and a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. The alcohol has >95% ee. The peaks are visualized at 254 nm, with the racemic alcohol 2 exhibiting equal peaks with retention times of 18.1 and 19.5 min, and the enantioenriched alcohol ((S)-2) exhibiting a major peak with a retention time of 19.2 min (minor enantiomer has a retention time of 18.4 min). Enantioenriched acetate ((R)-3) exhibits the following characteristics: 1H NMR pdf(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.42 (s, 6 H), 1.51 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 2.08 (s, 3 H), 5.51 (m, 1 H), 7.37 - 7.39 (m, 3 H), 7.60 - 7.63 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR pdf(150 MHz, CDCl3) δ: -1.2, 20.7, 21.2, 60.3, 87.1, 105.3, 127.7, 129.3, 133.4, 136.2, 169.2; IR (film) υmax 3068, 2991, 2954, 2178, 1744, 1434, 1364 cm−1; HRMS (CI, NH3) m/z calcd for C14H19O2Si [M+H]+ 245.0998, found: 245.1018; Anal. calcd. for C14H18O2Si: C, 68.25, H, 7.36. Found: C, 68.53, H, 7.21; [α]20D+ 100 (7.4, CH2Cl2). Determination of the enantiomeric excess of the acetate required the synthesis of the racemic acetate (±)-3 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Acetylation of racemic alcohol
Scheme 1. Acetylation of racemic alcohol
Alcohol (±)-2 (523 mg, 2.56 mmol, 1 equiv) is dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (32 mg, 0.256 mmol, 0.1 equiv), triethylamine (3.57 mL, 2.59 g, 25.6 mmol, 10 equiv) and acetic anhydride (1.2 mL, 1.31 g, 12.7 mmol, 5 equiv) are added in that order. The resulting solution is stirred at room temperature for 12 h, diluted with ammonium chloride (10 mL), filtered through a Celite plug and rinsed with CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The phases are separated and the aqueous layer is extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers are washed with brine (20 mL), dried over Na2SO4 (5 g), filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by flash chromatography (5% ethyl acetate/hexanes) to afford racemic acetate (±)-3 (0.493 g, 78% yield) as a colorless oil. The checkers established enantiomeric purity by HPLC analysis (Note 17) run on a Chiralpak IB-3 column eluting in 0.2% 2-propanol/hexanes, with a 2.0 μL injection and a 0.3 mL/min flow rate. The acetate has >99% ee. The peaks are visualized at 210 nm, with the racemic acetate (±)-3 exhibiting equal peaks with retention times of 10.0 and 11.6 min, and the enantioenriched alcohol (R)-3 exhibiting a major peak with a retention time of 10.9 min; the minor enantiomer is not observed.
11. Both trimethylorthoacetate and xylenes are purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification.
12. It is critical that the bath temperature be kept at this temperature or the reaction will not go to completion.
13. Most of the xylenes is removed using a rotary evaporator with the water bath heated to 60 °C and by using dry ice/acetone in the cooling trap, the remainder is removed during the chromatography purification step.
14. The column was packed with 150 g of silica gel. Hexanes (500 mL) was used to elute the xylenes (Rf = 1.0, 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes) then elution with 1.5 L of 2% ethyl acetate/hexanes afforded the product, which has an Rf = 0.85 in 20% ethyl acetate/hexanes, and stains strongly with potassium permanganate.
15. Enantiomerically enriched allenylsilane ((Ra)-4) exhibits the following characteristics: 1H NMR pdf(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.38 (s, 6 H), 1.64 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.93 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.55 (s, 3 H), 4.94 (m, 1 H), 7.34 - 7.36 (m, 3 H), 7.53 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR pdf(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: -3.0, -2.9, 13.2, 36.0, 51.4, 81.2, 88.4, 127.6, 129.0, 133.7, 137.4, 172.0, 209.4; IR (film) υmax 2954, 1945, 1740, 1434 cm−1; HRMS (EI+) m/z calcd for C15H20O2Si [M]+ 260.1233, found: 260.1252; [α]20D -5.8 (c 5.7, CH2Cl2). When the reaction was performed at half-scale, 3.61 g (83%) of product was isolated. Purity (>98%) was established by HPLC analysis: ChiraCel OD column, eluent = i-PrOH/hexane = 0.5/99.5, flow = 1 mL/min, detection = 254 nm, injection volume : 20 μL, retention time = 4.39 mi (major isomer).
16. To determine the enantiomeric excess of allenylsilane (Ra)-4 the methyl ester was reduced to a primary alcohol using lithium borohydride (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Reduction of Methyl Ester
Scheme 2. Reduction of Methyl Ester
A single-necked, 25-mL round-bottomed flask equipped with a rubber septum and a 1-inch egg-shaped magnetic stir bar is charged with lithium borohydride (0.046 g, 2.12 mmol, 2 equiv), diethyl ether (3 mL) and methanol (0.2 mL). The resulting mixture is cooled to 0 °C and a solution of (Ra)-4 (0.27 g, 1.06 mmol, 1 equiv) in diethyl ether (3 mL) is added. The solution is stirred for 12 h while warming slowly to room temperature. Upon completion of the reaction, ethyl acetate (3 mL), acetone (3 mL) and water (10 mL) are added sequentially. The aqueous layer is separated and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic phases are washed with brine (10 mL), dried with sodium sulfate (200 mg), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification over silica gel (4 g) using 100 mL of 10% ethyl acetate/hexanes results in (R)-3-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)hexa-3,4-dien-1-ol (Ra)-5 (0.204 g, 0.880 mmol, 83%) as a colorless oil. The alcohol (Ra)-5 exhibits the following characteristics: 1H NMR pdf(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.37 (s, 6 H), 1.58 (m, 1 H), 1.64 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.16-2.18 (m, 2 H), 3.67 (m, 2 H), 4.91 (m, 1 H), 7.35 - 7.36 (m, 3 H), 7.52 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR pdf(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: -3.2, -3.1, 13.8, 32.6, 62.2, 81.1, 91.7, 127.8, 129.2, 133.7, 137.9, 172.0, 207.3; IR (film) υmax 3363, 3072, 2953, 2889, 1932, 1426, 1369 cm−1; HRMS (EI+) m/z calcd for C14H20OSi [M]+ 232.1252, found: 232.1255; Anal. calcd. for C14H20OSi: C, 72.36, H, 8.67. Found: C, 71.77, H, 8.80; [α]20D-18.6 (c 4.9, CH2Cl2); Rf = 0.25 in 5:1 hexanes/ethyl acetate. The enantiomeric excess determination required the synthesis of the racemic alcohol (±)-5. The procedures used for the synthesis of the racemic compound were entirely analogous to the ones used to synthesize the enantiomerically enriched alcohol (Ra)-5 (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the racemic alcohol
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the racemic alcohol
The checkers established the enantiomeric purity by HPLC analysis (Note 17) run on a Chiralpak IB-3 column eluting in 0.5% 2-propanol/hexanes, with a 2.0 μL injection and a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. The alcohol has >93% ee. The peaks are visualized at 210 nm, with the racemic alcohol (±)-5 exhibiting equal peaks with retention times of 14.2 and 15.8 min, and the enantioenriched alcohol (Ra)-5 exhibiting a major peak with a retention time of 12.8 min (minor enantiomer has a retention time of 11.9 min). The submitters established enantiomeric purity of the alcohol using a ChiralCel OD column eluting in 1% 2-propanol/hexanes with a 10 μL injection and a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. The peaks are visualized at 254 nm, with the racemic alcohol (±)-5 exhibiting equal peaks with retention times of 14.3 and 15.8 min, and the enantioenriched alcohol (Ra)-5 exhibiting a major peak with a retention time of 15.7 min (minor enantiomer has a retention time of 14.6 min).
17. Enantiomeric excess determinations reported by the checkers were performed by Chiral Technologies, Inc. The checkers and Organic Syntheses gratefully acknowledge their assistance.
Handling and Disposal of Hazardous Chemicals
The procedures in this article are intended for use only by persons with prior training in experimental organic chemistry. All hazardous materials should be handled using the standard procedures for work with chemicals described in references such as "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory" (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011 www.nap.edu). All chemical waste should be disposed of in accordance with local regulations. For general guidelines for the management of chemical waste, see Chapter 8 of Prudent Practices.
These procedures must be conducted at one's own risk. Organic Syntheses, Inc., its Editors, and its Board of Directors do not warrant or guarantee the safety of individuals using these procedures and hereby disclaim any liability for any injuries or damages claimed to have resulted from or related in any way to the procedures herein.
3. Discussion
Allenylsilanes have proven to be versatile carbon nucleophiles for a variety of organic transformations.2 In particular, chiral allenes have generated interest in the synthetic community due to the efficient transfer of the axial chirality in the allene into point chirality in the reaction products. Although allenylsilanes have proven to be effective nucleophiles for a variety of transformations, relatively few procedures exist for the multigram synthesis of highly enantioenriched reagents. Previous methods for the synthesis of chiral allenylsilane reagents typically use the SN2' displacement strategy developed by Fleming.3 A variety of other methods for the synthesis of enantioenriched allenylsilanes have begun to emerge in the literature, showing the increase in interest in these reagents.4
This submission details an efficient multi-gram synthesis of highly enantioenriched allenylsilanes. The allenes are formed in high yields with high levels of enantioselectivity by taking advantage of a C-selective silylation, followed by a lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution, and a Johnson orthoester Claisen rearrangement. The (R) enantiomer of alcohol 2 can also be accessed by re-exposure of protected acetate (R)-3 to the lipase in aqueous buffer, followed by the orthoester Claisen rearrangement, resulting in the (Sa) enantiomer of allenylsilane 4 (Scheme 4).5
Scheme 4. Synthesis of allenylsilane (Sa)-4.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of allenylsilane (Sa)-4.
Allenylsilanes 3 have been used as carbon nuclophiles in additions to oxonium ions to form homopropargylic ethers,5 which can be used as a template for the formation of structurally and stereochemically diverse heterocycles containing a 1,2,3-triazole functionality.6 In addition the allenylsilanes undergo additions to iminium ions, forming dihydropyrroles, dihydrooxazines and acyclic homopropargylic sulfonamides, with the reaction product determined by the nitrogen source used in iminium ion formation.7 Stereoselective C-glycosidations allow for the formation of dihydropyran products with a side chain containing an internal alkyne.8 Current work is focused on the development of a new methodology taking advantage of the axial chirality these reagents, as well as the application of this methodology to complex molecule synthesis (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5. Reactions products formed from enantioenriched allenylsilanes.
Scheme 5. Reactions products formed from enantioenriched allenylsilanes.

References and Notes
  1. Department of Chemistry and Center for Chemical Methodology and Library Development, Metcalf Center for Science and Engineering, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215. Email: . Funding for this work was provided by the NIH and through an AstraZeneca graduate fellowship to RAB.
  2. (a) Modern Allene Chemistry. Krause, N.; Hashmi, A.S.K., Eds. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004. (b) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3925-3927. (c) Danheiser, R. L.; Kwasigroch, C. A.; Tsai, Y.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7233-7235. (d) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J.; Kwasigroch, C. A. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3870-3878. (e) Danheiser, R. L.; Stoner, E. J. ; Koyama, H.; Yamashita, D. S.; Klade, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4407-4413. (f) Curtis-Long, M. J.; Aye, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5402-5416. (g) Lopez, F.; Mascarenas, J. L. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 418-428.
  3. (a) Westmuze, H.; Vermeer, P. Synthesis 1979, 390-392. (b) Fleming, I.; Terrett, N. K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 264, 99-118. (c) Fleming, I.; Waterson, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1809-1813. (d) Buckle, M. J. C.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2383-2386. (e) Marshall, J. A.; Maxon, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 630-633.
  4. (a) Suginome, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Ito, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4884-4885. (b) Han, J. W.; Tokunaga, N.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12915-12916. (c) Ogasawara, M.; Ito, A.; Yoshida, K.; Hayashi, T. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2715-2718. (d) Nishimura,T.; Makino, H.; Nagaosa, M.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12865-12867. (e) Canales, E.; Gonzalez, A.; Soderquist, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 397-399. (f) Gonzalez, A. Z.; Soderquist, J. A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1081-1084. (g) Ohmiya, H.; Ito, H.; Sawamura, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5618-5621. (h) Ogasawara, M.; Okada, A.; Subbarayan, V.; Sörgel, S.; Takahashi, T. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5736-5739.
  5. Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2689-2692.
  6. Brawn, R. A.; Welzel, M.; Lowe, J. T.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 336-339.
  7. (a) Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 473-476. (b) Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4362-4365.
  8. Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4624-4627.

Appendix
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature (Collective Index Number);
(Registry Number)

Lithium chloride; (7447-41-8)

3-butyn-2-ol; (2028-63-9)

n-Butyllithium; (109-72-8)

Chloro(dimethyl)phenylsilane; (768-33-2)

Vinyl Acetate; (108-05-4)

Trimethylorthoacetate; (1445-45-0)

Propionic Acid; (79-09-4)

Lithium Borohydride; (16949-15-8)

(±)-4-(Dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol; (115884-67-8)

(S)-4-(Dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-ol; (142697-17-4)

(S)-4-(Dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)-but-3-yn-2-yl acetate; (142611-82-3)

(Ra)-Methyl 3-(dimethyl(phenyl)silyl)hexa-3,4-dienoate; (945539-62- 8)

James Panek was born in Buffalo NY in 1956. He earned a B.S. in Medicinal Chemistry, 1979, from the University at Buffalo (SUNY@Buffalo) and his Ph.D. in Medicinal Chemistry from the University of Kansas, 1984. He then pursued an NIH postdoctoral program at Yale University before joining the faculty at Boston University. Presently he serves as The Samour Family Professor of Chemistry. His research interests emphasize the field of synthetic organic chemistry, mainly in the area of acyclic stereocontrol with specific interest in the development of new reagents and new reaction methods. Ongoing studies in the area of natural product synthesis generate a complimentary research effort. Panek is also affiliated with the Center for Chemical Methodology and Library Development (CMLD) at Boston University.
Ryan Brawn was born in Camden, ME in 1980. He earned his BA in Biochemistry from Bowdoin College in 2003. He is currently finishing his Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry at Boston University in the Panek lab. His thesis work has focused on the development of enantioenriched allenylsilane reagents, and their use as carbon nucleophiles for a variety of stereocontrolled reactions. He is currently a postdoctoral fellowship at Pfizer, Groton CT and will begin work in the CVM group in Groton, CT in 2011.
Francois Grillet was born in 1982 in Saint Remy, France. He studied chemistry at the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Mulhouse where he received his engineer diploma in 2005. He then moved to Grenoble to carry out his Ph.D. under the supervision of Professor Andrew E. Greene working in the area of natural products synthesis. He is currently working as a post-doctoral fellow to apply the allenic Pauson-Khand reaction to the [5-7-5] ring system of 6,12-guaianolides in the group of Professor Kay Brummond at the University of Pittsburgh.